RBSE Guide
Social ·Class 8 Social Science

What might happen if one of the organs-Legislature, Executive, Judiciary-had all the power? Class 8

R
RBSEGuide
· Jul 08, 2026 · Reviewed & updated Sep 17, 2026 · 3 min read

What might happen if one of the organs-Legislature, Executive, Judiciary-had all the power? Class 8

Question 1.

What might happen if one of the organs-Legislature, Executive, Judiciary-had all the power? How could it affect the rights of people? Discuss with your classmates how each organ checks the others. For example, how does the Legislature question the actions of the Executive? How does the Judiciary make sure that laws and government actions respect the Constitution? Do you think there might be ways in which the actions of the Judiciary itself are reviewed? (Page 154-155) Class 8

Answer:

If one of the organs had all the power, it would go against the spirit of the Constitution and affect people's rights and freedoms.


If the Legislature becomes supreme and has all the power, laws could become unfair or biased and might not protect the rights of all people.If the Executive had all the power, decisions could benefit only the ruling political party, instead of serving the public.


If the Judiciary had all the power, judges might interfere with the legislature and the executive, taking away decision-making authority from elected representatives, which would go against democratic principles. In all these situations, India would no longer remain a true democracy, and people would lose their democratic rights.


these ways: The Judiciary ensures laws and actions follow the Constitution and can cancel those that violate it. It checks the Legislature and Executive to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. The Judiciary upholds the balance of power, protecting people's rights and democracy.


Yes, I think there are ways in which the actions of the Judiciary can be reviewed. The Judiciary, while independent, is responsible for ensuring that the laws passed by the Legislature and the actions of the Executive do not violate the Constitution. If the Judiciary oversteps its role or makes decisions beyond its authority, it can be checked by the other branches, particularly through the process of judicial review. In cases of serious misconduct or corruption, judges can also be impeached by the Legislature. This helps ensure that the Judiciary remains fair and accountable.


Question 2.

Can you find examples where the Judiciary has asked lawmakers to review a law? Can you find any instances when the implementation of a law has been questioned by the Judiciary?

Answer:

The Judiciary often points out issues with laws and suggests changes. Some examples include:

  1. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: In 2024, the Supreme Court gave a clear interpretation regarding the type of driving license needed for transport vehicles under the Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) category and asked the Government to amend the law to remove any confusion.
  2. Uniform Civil Code (UCC): The Supreme Court stressed the need for a Uniform Civil Code, arguing that one common set of laws for all religions would promote equality and prevent discrimination.
  3. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) (2015): The Supreme Court struck down the NJAC Act, questioning its implementation and suggesting a review of the judicial appointment process.
  4. Right to Privacy (2017): The Supreme Court ruled that privacy is a fundamental right and asked lawmakers to review laws like the Aadhaar Act for privacy concerns.


The Judiciary has intervened in several cases where the implementation of laws was questioned:

  1. In 2013, the Supreme Court directed the government to ensure effective implementation of the Right to Information Act (RTI) due to delays by various departments.
  2. In 2016, the Supreme Court emphasised the need for timely wage payments to workers under MNREGA and directed the government to improve its implementation.
  3. In 2005, the Supreme Court ordered the government to take strict measures to address pollution in the Ganga and Yamuna rivers, ensuring the proper implementation of environmental laws.
  4. The Supreme Court in 1997 halted deforestation activities and ordered the government to properly implement the Forest Conservation Act to prevent further environmental damage.