Form groups in your class to discuss the following questions, then compare the groups' answers. Class 7

Form groups in your class to discuss the following questions, then compare the groups' answers. Class 7

Form groups in your class to discuss the following questions, then compare the groups' answers. (Page 74) Class 7

Question 1.

What qualities does Kalhana think a historian should have? Class 7

Answer:

Kalhana believes that a good historian should be thorough and careful. They need to gather information from various sources, like earlier writings and inscriptions, to create a complete picture of the past. A historian should also be honest and fair, presenting facts without bias. This way, they can help people understand history better and learn from it.

Question 2.

What do these lines reveal about his method of gathering information? In what ways does it resemble or differ from the way history is currently written? Class 7

Answer:

Kalhana's method of gathering information involved researching many earlier works and consulting different types of records, like inscriptions and royal grants. This is similar to how historians today use various sources, including documents, artefacts, and interviews. However, modern historians often use scientific methods and peer reviews to ensure accuracy, while Kalhana relied more on his interpretation of past events and moral lessons.

Question 3.

Kalhana also writes, "That nobleminded poet is alone worthy of praise whose words, like that of a judge, remain free from love or hatred in relating the facts of the past." What does he mean by "free from love or hatred'? How would meeting this condition make a historian more reliable? Class 7

Answer:

When Kalhana says a historian should be 'free from love or hatred,' he means they should not let their personal feelings influence how they tell the story. A reliable historian presents facts objectively, like a judge. This impartiality helps ensure that the history they write is accurate and trustworthy, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the facts rather than the historian's biases.